RT Book, Section A1 Leskowitz, Eric A2 Warfield, Carol A. A2 Bajwa, Zahid H. SR Print(0) ID 3422222 T1 Chapter 77. Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Pain Management T2 Principles & Practice of Pain Medicine, 2e YR 2004 FD 2004 PB The McGraw-Hill Companies PP New York, NY SN 9780071443494 LK accessanesthesiology.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=3422222 RD 2024/04/24 AB Alternative medicine is rapidly growing in popularity. In what may eventually prove to be the most frequently cited medical journal article in the postwar era, Eisenberg and colleagues demonstrated in 1993 that nearly 40% of Americans utilized alternative medical therapies, and spent more out of pocket for these approaches than they spent out of pocket for mainstream medical treatments.1 A follow-up study in 1998 showed continued dramatic growth in these practices.2 The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has supported an Office of Alternative Medicine since 1993, but thanks to steady increases in congressional funding, it was recently upgraded to a division within the NIH. The November 1998 issues of several of the American Medical Association (AMA)-sponsored specialty journals were devoted to the topic of complementary and alternative medicine (commonly abbreviated CAM); Micozzi’s 1996 text on alternative medicine3 was only the first of many. This rapid rise in interest to what was previously a fringe topic lends an aura of novelty to these techniques, but a cursory look at some of the most common CAM techniques (acupuncture, homeopathy, yoga) shows that these are, in fact, traditional, if not ancient, therapies. And so it should not be surprising that the most common symptom that brings people to their health care providers—pain—has a long and rich tradition of CAM interventions. This chapter outlines some of the more prominent and promising CAM approaches to pain conditions, both acute and chronic, at the same time that it outlines some fundamental similarities and differences between CAM and mainstream biomedical therapies.