RT Book, Section A1 Warren, Daniel T. A1 Neal, Joseph M. A1 Bernards, Christopher M. A2 Longnecker, David E. A2 Brown, David L. A2 Newman, Mark F. A2 Zapol, Warren M. SR Print(0) ID 56638559 T1 Chapter 47. Neuraxial Anesthesia T2 Anesthesiology, 2e YR 2012 FD 2012 PB The McGraw-Hill Companies PP New York, NY SN 978-0-07-178513-6 LK accessanesthesiology.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=56638559 RD 2024/04/19 AB A systematic and rational approach based on a thorough 3-dimensional understanding of anatomy should be used when accessing the subarachnoid or epidural space.Anesthetic doses, agents, and combinations of agents should be individualized to optimize neuraxial blockade for a given clinical setting.Hypotension and bradycardia associated with neuraxial anesthesia should be identified early and treated aggressively to minimize development of cardiovascular collapse and poor outcome.Our understanding of potential neurotoxicity and the nature of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) are continuing to evolve. However, there is growing consensus that TNS may not represent direct neural toxicity.Evaluating the appropriateness of neuraxial procedures in patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications is a challenge. Clinicians should be familiar with the recommendations presented by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine in the consensus statement addressing these issues.When suspicion of spinal hematoma or abscess is credible, definitive diagnosis with appropriate imaging and prompt surgical decompression within 4 to 8 hours of onset of neurologic symptoms is crucial to improve chances of recovery of function.Developing an understanding of the nature of combined spinal–epidural anesthesia and facility with its techniques can expand a clinician's armamentarium to provide neuraxial anesthesia and optimize patient care.