Goodman & Gilman's: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 12e

Chapter 9: Muscarinic Receptor Agonists and Antagonists

Joan Heller Brown; Nora Laiken

ACETYLCHOLINE AND ITS MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR TARGET

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the peripheral nervous system occur primarily on autonomic effector cells innervated by postganglionic parasympathetic nerves. Muscarinic receptors are also present in autonomic ganglia and on some cells (e.g., vascular endothelial cells) that, paradoxically, receive little or no cholinergic innervation. Within the central nervous system (CNS), the hippocampus, cortex, and thalamus have high densities of muscarinic receptors.

Acetylcholine (ACh), the naturally occurring neurotransmitter for these receptors, has virtually no systemic therapeutic applications because its actions are diffuse, and its hydrolysis, catalyzed by both acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and plasma butyrylcholinesterase, is rapid. Muscarinic agonists mimic the effects of ACh at these sites. These agonists typically are longer-acting congeners of ACh or natural alkaloids, some of which stimulate nicotinic as well as muscarinic receptors.

The mechanisms of action of endogenous ACh at the postjunctional membranes of the effector cells and neurons that represent different types of cholinergic synapses are discussed in Chapter 8. To recapitulate, these synapses are found at: 1) autonomic effector sites innervated by postganglionic parasympathetic nerves (or, in the sweat glands, by postganglionic sympathetic nerves); 2) sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia and the adrenal medulla, innervated by preganglionic autonomic nerves; 3) motor end plates on skeletal muscle, innervated by somatic motor nerves; and 4) certain synapses in the CNS (Krnjevic, 2004), where ACh can have either pre- or postsynaptic actions. When ACh is administered systemically, it can potentially act at all of these sites; however, as a quaternary ammonium compound, its penetration to the CNS is limited, and the amount of ACh that reaches peripheral areas with low blood flow is limited due to hydrolysis by plasma butyrylcholinesterase.

The actions of ACh and related drugs at autonomic effector sites are referred to as muscarinic, based on the observation that the alkaloid muscarine acts selectively at those sites and produces the same qualitative effects as ACh. The muscarinic, or parasympathomimetic, actions of the drugs considered in this chapter are practically equivalent to the parasympathetic effects of ACh listed in Table 8–1. Muscarinic receptors are present in autonomic ganglia and the adrenal medulla but primarily function to modulate the nicotinic actions of ACh at these sites (Chapter 11). In the CNS, muscarinic receptors are widely distributed and have a role in mediating many important responses. The differences between the actions of ACh and other muscarinic agonists are largely quantitative, with limited selectivity for one organ system or another. All of the actions of ACh and its congeners at muscarinic receptors can be blocked by atropine.

Properties and Subtypes of Muscarinic Receptors

Muscarinic receptors were characterized initially by analysis of the responses of cells and organ systems in the periphery and the CNS. For example, differential effects of two muscarinic agonists, bethanechol and McN-A-343, on the tone of the lower esophageal sphincter led to the initial designation of muscarinic receptors as M₁ (ganglionic) and M₂ (effector cell) (Goyal and Rattan, 1978). The cloning of the cDNAs that encode muscarinic receptors identified five distinct gene products (Bonner et al., 1987), now designated as M₁ through M₅ muscarinic receptors (Chapter 8). All of the known muscarinic receptors are G protein-coupled receptors that in turn couple to various cellular effectors (Chapter 3). Although selectivity is not absolute, stimulation of M₁, M₃, and M₅ receptors causes hydrolysis of polyphosphoinositides and mobilization of intracellular Ca²⁺ as a consequence of activation of the G_q-PLC pathway (Chapter 8), resulting in a variety of Ca²⁺-mediated responses. In contrast, M₂ and M₄ muscarinic receptors inhibit adenylyl cyclase and regulate specific ion channels via their coupling to the pertussis toxin–sensitive G proteins, G_i and G_o (Chapter 3).

The binding site for the endogenous agonist ACh, the orthosteric site (Neubig et al., 2003), is highly conserved among muscarinic receptor subtypes (Hulme et al., 2003). By analogy with the position of retinal in the orthosteric site of the mammalian rhodopsin receptor structure (Palczewski et al., 2000), the ACh orthosteric binding site is putatively located toward the extracellular regions of a cleft formed by several of the receptor's seven transmembrane helices. An aspartic acid present in the N-terminal portion of the third transmembrane helix of all five muscarinic receptor subtypes is believed to form an ionic bond with the cationic quaternary nitrogen in ACh and the tertiary or quaternary nitrogen of antagonists (Caulfield and Birdsall, 1998; Wess, 1996).

The five muscarinic receptor subtypes are widely distributed in both the CNS and peripheral tissues; most cells express at least two subtypes (Abrams et al., 2006; Wess, 1996; Wess et al., 2007). Identifying the role of a specific subtype in mediating a particular muscarinic response to ACh has been difficult due to the lack of subtype-specific agonists and antagonists. More recently, gene-targeting techniques have been used to elucidate the functions of each subtype (Wess et al., 2007). These techniques have allowed the creation of mutant mice with null alleles for the genes of each of the muscarinic receptor subtypes (Gomeza et al., 1999; Hamilton et al., 1997; Matsui et al., 2000; Wess, 2004; Yamada et al., 2001a, 2001b). All of these muscarinic receptor knockout mice are viable and fertile. The minimal phenotypic alteration that accompanies deletion of a single receptor subtype suggests functional redundancy between receptor subtypes in various tissues. For example, abolition of cholinergic bronchoconstriction, salivation, pupillary constriction, and bladder contraction generally requires deletion of more than a single receptor subtype. Such knockout mice studies have resulted in an increased understanding of the physiological roles of the individual muscarinic receptor subtypes (Wess et al., 2007; Table 8–3); many of the findings are consistent with the results obtained from examining the localization of muscarinic receptor subtypes in human tissues (Abrams et al., 2006). Although there is functional redundancy, the M₂ receptor is the predominant subtype in the cholinergic control of the heart, while the M₃ receptor is the predominant subtype in the cholinergic control of smooth muscle, secretory glands, and the eye. The M₁ receptor has an important role in the modulation of nicotinic cholinergic transmission in ganglia.

Although antagonists that can discriminate between various muscarinic receptor subtypes have been identified, the development of selective agonists and antagonists has generally been difficult because of the high conservation of the orthosteric site across subtypes (Conn et al., 2009b). Muscarinic receptors seem to possess topographically distinct allosteric binding sites, with at least one being located in the extracellular loops and outermost segments of different transmembrane helices; these sites are less conserved across receptor subtypes than the orthosteric binding site and thus offer the potential for greater subtype-selective targeting (Birdsall and Lazareno, 2005; May et al., 2007). Ligands that bind to allosteric sites are called allosteric modulators, because they can change the conformation of the receptor to modulate the affinity or efficacy of the orthosteric ligand. Progress has been made in developing selective positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) as important candidates for drugs with muscarinic receptor subtype selectivity, especially in the CNS (Conn et al., 2009a, 2009b). Selective negative allosteric modulators (NAMs), which act at an allosteric site to reduce the responsiveness of specific muscarinic receptor subtype(s) to ACh, also may become important therapeutic agents in the future. In both instances, the modulators do not activate the receptor by themselves, but can potentiate (in the case of PAMs) or inhibit (in the case of NAMs) receptor activation by ACh at specific muscarinic receptor subtype(s). Allosteric agonists have also been identified that appear to mediate receptor activation through a distinct allosteric site even in the absence of an orthosteric agonist (Nawaratne et al., 2008). Another potential mechanism for achieving selectivity is though the development of hybrid, bitopic orthosteric/allosteric ligands, which interact with both the orthosteric site and an allosteric site, a mechanism recently demonstrated to explain the unique effects of the M₁ selective agonist McN-A-343 (Valant et al., 2008).

Pharmacological Effects of Acetylcholine

The influence of ACh and parasympathetic innervation on various organs and tissues was introduced in Chapter 8; a more detailed description of the effects of ACh is presented here as background for understanding the physiological basis for the therapeutic uses of the muscarinic receptor agonists and antagonists.

Cardiovascular System. ACh has four primary effects on the cardiovascular system:

vasodilation
decrease in heart rate (negative chronotropic effect)
decrease in the conduction velocity in the atrioventricular (AV) node (negative dromotropic effect)
decrease in the force of cardiac contraction (negative inotropic effect)

The last effect is of lesser significance in the ventricles than in the atria. Some of the above responses can be obscured by baroreceptor and other reflexes that dampen the direct responses to ACh.

Although ACh rarely is given systemically, its cardiac actions are important because the cardiac effects of cardiac glycosides, anti-arrhythmic agents, and many other drugs are at least partly due to changes in parasympathetic (vagal) stimulation of the heart; in addition, afferent stimulation of the viscera during surgical interventions can reflexly increase the vagal stimulation of the heart.

The intravenous injection of a small dose of ACh produces a transient fall in blood pressure owing to generalized vasodilation (mediated by vascular endothelial NO), which is usually accompanied by reflex tachycardia. A considerably larger dose is required to see direct effects of ACh on the heart, such as eliciting bradycardia or AV nodal conduction block. The generalized vasodilation produced by exogenously administered ACh is due to the stimulation of muscarinic receptors, primarily of the M₃subtype (Khurana et al., 2004; Lamping et al., 2004), located on vascular endothelial cells despite the apparent lack of cholinergic innervation. Occupation of the receptors by agonist activates the G_q–PLC–IP₃ pathway, leading to Ca²⁺-calmodulin–dependent activation of endothelial NO synthase and production of NO (endothelium-derived relaxing factor) (Moncada and Higgs, 1995), which diffuses to adjacent vascular smooth muscle cells and causes them to relax (Furchgott, 1999; Ignarro et al., 1999) (Chapters 3 and Chapter 8). If the endothelium is damaged, as occurs under various pathophysiological conditions, ACh acts predominantly on M₃ receptors located on vascular smooth muscle cells, causing vasoconstriction.

Although endogenous ACh does not have a significant role in the physiological regulation of peripheral vascular tone, there is evidence that baroreceptor or chemoreceptor reflexes or direct stimulation of the vagus can elicit parasympathetic coronary vasodilation mediated by ACh and the consequent production of NO by the endothelium (Feigl, 1998). However, neither parasympathetic vasodilator nor sympathetic vasoconstrictor tone plays a major role in the regulation of coronary blood flow relative to the effects of local oxygen tension, activation of K_ATP channels, and autoregulatory metabolic factors such as adenosine (Berne and Levy, 2001).

ACh affects cardiac function directly and also indirectly through inhibition of the adrenergic stimulation of the heart. Cardiac effects of ACh are mediated primarily by M₂muscarinic receptors (Stengel et al., 2000), which couple to G_i/G_o. The direct effects include an increase in the ACh-activated K⁺ current (I_K-ACh) due to activation of K-ACh channels, a decrease in the L-type Ca²⁺ current (I_Ca-L) due to inhibition of L-type Ca²⁺ channels, and a decrease in the cardiac pacemaker current (I_f) due to inhibition of HCN (pacemaker) channels (DiFrancesco and Tromba, 1987). The indirect effects include a G_i-mediated decrease in cyclic AMP, which opposes and counteracts the β₁ adrenergic/G_s–mediated increase in cyclic AMP, and an inhibition of the release of norepinephrine from sympathetic nerve terminals. The inhibition of norepinephrine release is mediated by presynaptic M₂ and M₃ receptors, which are stimulated by ACh released from adjacent parasympathetic postganglionic nerve terminals (Trendelenburg et al., 2005). There are also presynaptic M₂receptors that inhibit ACh release from parasympathetic postganglionic nerve terminals in the human heart (Oberhauser et al., 2001).

In the SA node, each normal cardiac impulse is initiated by the spontaneous depolarization of the pacemaker cells (Chapter 29). At a critical level (the threshold potential), this depolarization initiates an action potential. ACh slows the heart rate primarily by decreasing the rate of spontaneous depolarization; attainment of the threshold potential and the succeeding events in the cardiac cycle are therefore delayed. Until recently it was widely accepted that βadrenergic and muscarinic cholinergic effects on heart rate resulted from regulation of the cardiac pacemaker current (I_f). Unexpected findings made through genetic deletion of HCN4 and pharmacological inhibition of I_f have generated an alternative, albeit controversial, theory involving a pacemaking function for an intracellular Ca²⁺ "clock" (Lakatta and DiFrancesco, 2009) that might mediate effects of ACh on heart rate (Lyashkov et al., 2009).

In the atria, ACh causes hyperpolarization and a decreased action potential duration by increasing I_K-ACh. ACh also inhibits cyclic AMP formation and norepinephrine release, decreasing atrial contractility. The rate of impulse conduction is either unaffected or may increase in response to ACh; the increase probably is due to the activation of additional Na⁺ channels in response to ACh-induced hyperpolarization. In contrast, in the AV node (which has Ca²⁺ channel-dependent action potentials; see Chapter 29), ACh slows conduction and increases the refractory period by inhibiting I_Ca-L; the decrement in AV conduction is responsible for the complete heart block that may be observed when large quantities of cholinergic agonists are administered systemically. With an increase in parasympathetic (vagal) tone, such as is produced by the digitalis glycosides, the increased refractory period of the AV node can contribute to the reduction in the frequency with which aberrant atrial impulses are transmitted to the ventricles and thereby decrease the ventricular rate during atrial flutter or fibrillation.

Cholinergic (vagal) innervation of the His-Purkinje system and ventricular myocardium is sparse (Kent et al., 1974; Levy and Schwartz, 1994) and the effects of ACh are smaller than those observed in the atria and nodal tissues. In the ventricles, ACh, whether released by vagal stimulation or applied directly, has a small negative inotropic effect; this inhibition is most apparent when there is concomitant adrenergic stimulation or underlying sympathetic tone (Brodde and Michel, 1999; Levy and Schwartz, 1994; Lewis et al., 2001). Automaticity of Purkinje fibers is suppressed, and the threshold for ventricular fibrillation is increased (Kent and Epstein, 1976).

Respiratory Tract. The parasympathetic nervous system plays a major role in regulating bronchomotor tone. A diverse set of stimuli cause reflex increases in parasympathetic activity that contributes to bronchoconstriction. The effects of ACh on the respiratory system include not only bronchoconstriction but also increased tracheobronchial secretion and stimulation of the chemoreceptors of the carotid and aortic bodies. These effects are mediated primarily by M₃ muscarinic receptors (Fisher et al., 2004).

Urinary Tract. Parasympathetic sacral innervation causes detrusor muscle contraction, increased voiding pressure, and ureteral peristalsis. These responses are difficult to observe with administered ACh because poor perfusion of visceral organs and rapid hydrolysis by plasma butyrylcholinesterase limit access of systemically administered ACh to visceral muscarinic receptors. Control of bladder contraction apparently is mediated by multiple muscarinic receptor subtypes. Receptors of the M₂ subtype appear most prevalent in the bladder, yet studies with selective antagonists and M₃ knockout mice suggest that the M₃receptor mediates detrusor muscle contraction (Matsui et al., 2000). The M₂ receptor may act to inhibit β adrenergic receptor–mediated relaxation of the bladder and may be involved primarily in the filling stages to diminish urge incontinence (Chapple, 2000; Hegde and Eglen, 1999).

GI Tract. Although stimulation of vagal input to the GI tract increases tone, amplitude of contractions, and secretory activity of the stomach and intestine, such responses are inconsistently seen with administered ACh for the same reasons that urinary tract responses are difficult to observe. As in the urinary tract, muscarinic receptors of the M₂ subtype are most prevalent, but M₃ muscarinic receptors appear to be primarily responsible for mediating the cholinergic control of GI motility (Matsui et al., 2002).

Miscellaneous Peripheral Effects. In addition to its above-mentioned stimulatory effects on the tracheobronchial and GI secretions, ACh stimulates secretion from other glands that receive parasympathetic or sympathetic cholinergic innervation, including the lacrimal, nasopharyngeal, salivary, and sweat glands. All of these effects are mediated primarily by M₃ muscarinic receptors (Caulfield and Birdsall, 1998); M₁ receptors also contribute significantly to the cholinergic stimulation of salivary secretion (Gautam et al., 2004). When instilled into the eye, ACh produces miosis by contracting the pupillary sphincter muscle and accommodation for near vision by contracting the ciliary muscle (Chapter 64); both of these effects are mediated primarily by M₃ muscarinic receptors, but other subtypes may contribute to the ocular effects of cholinergic stimulation.

CNS Effects. While systemically administered ACh has limited CNS penetration, muscarinic agonists that can cross the blood-brain barrier evoke a characteristic cortical arousal or activation response, similar to that produced by injection of anticholinesterase agents or by electrical stimulation of the brainstem reticular formation. All five muscarinic receptor subtypes are found in the brain (Volpicelli and Levey, 2004), and recent studies suggest that muscarinic receptor-regulated pathways may have an important role in cognitive function, motor control, appetite regulation, nociception, and other processes (Wess et al., 2007).

MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR AGONISTS

Listen

Muscarinic cholinergic receptor agonists can be divided into two groups: 1) choline esters, including ACh and several synthetic esters; and 2) the naturally occurring cholinomimetic alkaloids (particularly pilocarpine, muscarine, and arecoline) and their synthetic congeners.

Of several hundred synthetic choline derivatives investigated, only methacholine, carbachol, and bethanechol (Figure 9–1) have had clinical applications. Methacholine (acetyl-β-methylcholine), the β-methyl analog of ACh, is a synthetic choline ester that differs from ACh chiefly in its greater duration and selectivity of action. Its action is more prolonged because the added methyl group increases its resistance to hydrolysis by cholinesterases. Its selectivity is reflected in a predominance of muscarinic with only minor nicotinic actions, the former manifest most clearly in the cardiovascular system (Table 9–1).

Table 9-1Some Pharmacological Properties of Choline Esters and Natural Alkaloids

View Table||Download (.pdf)

Table 9-1 Some Pharmacological Properties of Choline Esters and Natural Alkaloids

MUSCARINIC ACTIVITY

MUSCARINIC AGONIST

SUSCEPTIBILITY TO CHOLINESTERASES

Cardiovascular

Gastrointestinal

Urinary Bladder

Eye (Topical)

Antagonism by Atropine

NICOTINIC ACTIVITY

Acetylcholine

+++

Methacholine

+++

Carbachol

−

+++

Bethanechol

–

+++

−

Muscarine^a

−

+++

−

Pilocarpine

−

+++

−

^aNot used therapeutically

Figure 9–1.

Structural formulas of acetylcholine, choline esters, and natural alkaloids that stimulate muscarinic receptors.

View Full Size||Download Slide (.ppt)

Carbachol, and its β-methyl analog, bethanechol, are unsubstituted carbamoyl esters that are almost completely resistant to hydrolysis by cholinesterases; their t_1/2 are thus sufficiently long that they become distributed to areas of low blood flow. Carbachol retains substantial nicotinic activity, particularly on autonomic ganglia. Bethanechol has mainly muscarinic actions, with prominent effects on motility of the GI tract and urinary bladder.

The major natural alkaloid muscarinic agonists—muscarine, pilocarpine, and arecoline—have the same principal sites of action as the choline esters. Muscarine acts almost exclusively at muscarinic receptor sites, and the classification of these receptors derives from the actions of this alkaloid. Pilocarpine has a dominant muscarinic action but is a partial rather than a full agonist; the sweat glands are particularly sensitive to pilocarpine. Arecoline also acts at nicotinic receptors. Although these naturally occurring alkaloids are of great value as pharmacological tools and muscarine has toxicological significance (discussed later), present clinical use is restricted largely to the employment of pilocarpine as a sialagogue and miotic agent (Chapter 64).

History and Sources. The alkaloid muscarine was isolated from the mushroom Amanita muscaria by Schmiedeberg in 1869; its toxicology is discussed later. Pilocarpine is the chief alkaloid obtained from the leaflets of South American shrubs of the genus Pilocarpus. Although it was long known by the natives that the chewing of leaves of Pilocarpus plants caused salivation, the first experiments were apparently performed in 1874 by the Brazilian physician Coutinhou. The alkaloid was isolated in 1875, and shortly thereafter the actions of pilocarpine on the pupil and on the sweat and salivary glands were described by Weber. Arecoline is the chief alkaloid of areca or betel nuts, the seeds of Areca catechu. The red-staining betel nut is consumed as a euphoretic by the natives of the Indian subcontinent and East Indies in a masticatory mixture known as betel and composed of the nut, shell lime, and leaves of Piper betle, a climbing species of pepper. Methacholine was synthesized and studied by Hunt and Taveau as early as 1911. Carbachol and bethanechol were synthesized and investigated in the 1930s.

Absorption, Distribution, and Elimination

The absorption and distribution of these compounds may be predicted from their structures: muscarine and the choline esters are quaternary amines; pilocarpine and arecoline are tertiary amines (Figure 9–1).

Because they are quaternary amines, the choline esters are poorly absorbed following oral administration and have a limited ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Even though these drugs resist hydrolysis, the choline esters are short-acting agents due to rapid elimination by the kidneys.

Pilocarpine and arecoline, being tertiary amines, are readily absorbed and can cross the blood-brain barrier. In contrast, muscarine, a quaternary amine, is poorly absorbed. Muscarine can still, however, be toxic when ingested and can even have CNS effects. Although the specific metabolic pathways have not been elucidated, pilocarpine clearance is decreased in patients with hepatic impairment, in whom doses may need to be reduced. The natural alkaloids are primarily eliminated by the kidneys; excretion of the tertiary amines can be accelerated by acidification of the urine.

Therapeutic Uses of Muscarinic Receptor Agonists

Muscarinic agonists are currently used in the treatment of urinary bladder disorders and xerostomia and in the diagnosis of bronchial hyperreactivity. They are also used in ophthalmology as miotic agents and for the treatment of glaucoma.

There is growing interest in the role of muscarinic receptors in cognition. The potential utility of M₁ agonists in treating the cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer's disease has long been considered. Other receptor subtypes including M₂ and M₅ also appear to be involved in the regulation of cognitive function, at least in animal models (Wess et al., 2007).

The difficulty in developing subtype selective muscarinic receptor agonists, coupled with the lack of efficacy and the significant peripheral side effects of available muscarinic agonists, have prompted a search for other strategies for selectively activating specific muscarinic receptor subtypes, such as allosteric agonists and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) (Conn et al., 2009b). Selective muscarinic subtype activators may be useful in the treatment of additional CNS disorders, including schizophrenia and drug addiction, and as analgesic agents (Conn et al., 2009b). For example, xanomeline, a muscarinic agonist with some selectivity for the M₁ and M₄ subtypes that was in clinical development for Alzheimer's disease, has an antipsychotic profile in animal models and therapeutic efficacy in patients with schizophrenia (Mirza et al., 2003; Shekhar et al., 2008).

Acetylcholine. Although rarely given systemically, ACh (miochol-e) is used topically for the induction of miosis during ophthalmologic surgery; it is instilled into the eye as a 1% solution (Chapter 64).

Methacholine. Methacholine (provocholine) is administered by inhalation for the diagnosis of bronchial airway hyperreactivity in patients who do not have clinically apparent asthma (Crapo et al., 2000). While muscarinic agonists can cause bronchoconstriction and increased tracheobronchial secretions in all individuals, asthmatic patients respond with intense bronchoconstriction and a reduction in vital capacity. Accordingly, contraindications to methacholine testing include severe airflow limitation, recent myocardial infarction or stroke, uncontrolled hypertension, or pregnancy. The response to methacholine also may be exaggerated or prolonged in patients taking β adrenergic receptor antagonists. Emergency resuscitation equipment, oxygen, and medications to treat severe bronchospasm (e.g., β₂ adrenergic receptor agonists for inhalation) should be available during testing. Methacholine is available as a powder that is diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride and administered via a nebulizer.

Bethanechol. Bethanechol (urecholine, others) primarily affects the urinary and GI tracts. In the urinary tract, bethanechol has utility in treating urinary retention and inadequate emptying of the bladder when organic obstruction is absent, as in postoperative urinary retention, diabetic autonomic neuropathy, and certain cases of chronic hypotonic, myogenic, or neurogenic bladder (Wein, 1991); catheterization can thus be avoided. When used chronically, 10-50 mg of the drug is given orally three to four times daily; the drug should be administered on an empty stomach (i.e., 1 hour before or 2 hours after a meal) to minimize nausea and vomiting.

In the GI tract, bethanechol stimulates peristalsis, increases motility, and increases resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Bethanechol formerly was used to treat postoperative abdominal distention, gastric atony, gastroparesis, adynamic ileus, and gastroesophageal reflux; more efficacious therapies for these disorders are now available (Chapters 45 and Chapter 46).

Carbachol. Carbachol (miostat, isopto carbachol, others) is used topically in ophthalmology for the treatment of glaucoma and the induction of miosis during surgery; it is instilled into the eye as a 0.01-3% solution (Chapter 64).

Pilocarpine. Pilocarpine hydrochloride (salagen, others) is used for the treatment of xerostomia that follows head and neck radiation treatments or that is associated with Sjögren's syndrome (Porter et al., 2004;Wiseman and Faulds, 1995), an autoimmune disorder occurring primarily in women in whom secretions, particularly salivary and lacrimal, are compromised (Anaya and Talal, 1999). Provided salivary parenchyma maintains residual function, enhanced salivary secretion, ease of swallowing, and subjective improvement in hydration of the oral cavity are achieved. Side effects typify cholinergic stimulation, with sweating being the most common complaint. The usual dose is 5-10 mg three times daily; the dose should be lowered in patients with hepatic impairment.

Pilocarpine (isopto carpine, others) is used topically in ophthalmology for the treatment of glaucoma and as a miotic agent; it is instilled in the eye as a 0.5-6% solution and also can be delivered via an ocular insert (Chapter 64).

Cevimeline. Cevimeline (evoxac), a quinuclidine derivative of ACh, is a muscarinic agonist with a high affinity for M₃ muscarinic receptors on lacrimal and salivary gland epithelia. Cevimeline has a long-lasting sialogogic action and may have fewer side effects than pilocarpine (Anaya and Talal, 1999). Cevimeline also enhances lacrimal secretions in Sjögren's syndrome (Ono et al., 2004). The usual dose is 30 mg three times daily.

Contraindications, Precautions, and Adverse Effects

Most contraindications, precautions, and adverse effects are predictable consequences of muscarinic receptor stimulation. Thus, important contraindications to the use of muscarinic agonists include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, urinary or GI tract obstruction, acid-peptic disease, cardiovascular disease accompanied by bradycardia, hypotension, and hyperthyroidism (muscarinic agonists may precipitate atrial fibrillation in hyperthyroid patients). Common adverse effects include diaphoresis; diarrhea, abdominal cramps, nausea/vomiting, and other GI side effects; a sensation of tightness in the urinary bladder; difficulty in visual accommodation; and hypotension, which can severely reduce coronary blood flow, especially if it is already compromised. These contraindications and adverse effects are generally of limited concern with topical administration for ophthalmic use.

Toxicology. Poisoning from the ingestion of plants containing pilocarpine, muscarine, or arecoline is characterized chiefly by exaggeration of their various parasympathomimetic effects and resembles that produced by consumption of mushrooms of the genus Inocybe (described in the next section). Treatment consists of the parenteral administration of atropine in doses sufficient to cross the blood-brain barrier and measures to support the respiratory and cardiovascular systems and to counteract pulmonary edema.

Mushroom Poisoning (Mycetism). Mushroom poisoning has been known for centuries. The Greek poet Euripides (fifth century B.C.E.) is said to have lost his wife and three children from this cause. In recent years, the number of cases of mushroom poisoning has been increasing as the result of the current popularity of the consumption of wild mushrooms. Various species of mushrooms contain many toxins, and species within the same genus may contain distinct toxins.

Although Amanita muscaria is the source from which muscarine was isolated, its content of the alkaloid is so low (~ 0.003%) that muscarine cannot be responsible for the major toxic effects. Much higher concentrations of muscarine are present in various species of Inocybe and Clitocybe. The symptoms of intoxication attributable to muscarine develop within 30-60 minutes of ingestion; they include salivation, lacrimation, nausea, vomiting, headache, visual disturbances, abdominal colic, diarrhea, bronchospasm, bradycardia, hypotension, and shock. Treatment with atropine (1-2 mg intramuscularly every 30 minutes) effectively blocks these effects (Goldfrank, 2006; Köppel, 1993).

Intoxication produced by A. muscaria and related Amanitaspecies arises from the neurologic and hallucinogenic properties of muscimol, ibotenic acid, and other isoxazole derivatives. These agents stimulate excitatory and inhibitory amino acid receptors. Symptoms range from irritability, restlessness, ataxia, hallucinations, and delirium to drowsiness and sedation. Treatment is mainly supportive; benzodiazepines are indicated when excitation predominates; atropine often exacerbates the delirium.

Mushrooms from Psilocybe and Panaeolus species contain psilocybin and related derivatives of tryptamine. They also cause short-lasting hallucinations. Gyromitra species (false morels) produce GI disorders and a delayed hepatotoxicity. The toxic substance, acetaldehyde methylformylhydrazone, is converted in the body to reactive hydrazines. Although fatalities from liver and kidney failure have been reported, they are far less frequent than with amatoxin-containing mushrooms.

The most serious form of mycetism is produced by Amanita phalloides, other Amanita species, Lepiota, and Galerina species (Goldfrank, 2006). These species account for > 90% of all fatal cases. Ingestion of as little as 50 g of A. phalloides (deadly nightcap) can be fatal. The principal toxins are the amatoxins (α- and β-amanitin), a group of cyclic octapeptides that inhibit RNA polymerase II and thereby block mRNA synthesis. This causes cell death, manifested particularly in the GI mucosa, liver, and kidneys. Initial symptoms, which often are unnoticed or when present are due to other toxins, include diarrhea and abdominal cramps. A symptom-free period lasting up to 24 hours is followed by hepatic and renal malfunction. Death occurs in 4-7 days from renal and hepatic failure (Goldfrank, 2006). Treatment is largely supportive; penicillin, thioctic acid, and silibinin may be effective antidotes, but the evidence is based largely on anecdotal studies (Köppel, 1993).

Because the severity of toxicity and treatment strategies for mushroom poisoning depend on the species ingested, their identification should be sought. Often symptomatology is delayed, limiting the value of gastric lavage and administration of activated charcoal. Regional poison control centers in the U.S. maintain up-to-date information on the incidence of poisoning in the region and treatment procedures.

MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS

Listen

The muscarinic receptor antagonists include: 1) the naturally occurring alkaloids, atropine and scopolamine; 2) semisynthetic derivatives of these alkaloids, which primarily differ from the parent compounds in their disposition in the body or their duration of action; and 3) synthetic derivatives, some of which show selectivity for subtypes of muscarinic receptors. Noteworthy agents among the latter two categories are homatropine and tropicamide, which have a shorter duration of action than atropine, and methscopolamine, ipratropium, and tiotropium, which are quaternized and do not cross the blood-brain barrier or readily cross membranes. The synthetic derivatives possessing some degree of receptor selectivity include pirenzepine, which shows selectivity for M₁ receptors; and darifenacin and solifenacin, which show selectivity for M₃ receptors.

Muscarinic antagonists prevent the effects of ACh by blocking its binding to muscarinic receptors on effector cells at parasympathetic (and sympathetic cholinergic) neuroeffector junctions, in peripheral ganglia, and in the CNS. In general, muscarinic antagonists cause little blockade of nicotinic receptors. However, the quaternary ammonium antagonists generally exhibit a greater degree of nicotinic blocking activity and therefore are more likely to interfere with ganglionic or neuromuscular transmission.

While many effects of muscarinic antagonists can be predicted from an understanding of the physiological responses mediated by muscarinic receptors at parasympathetic (and sympathetic cholinergic) neuroeffector junctions, paradoxical responses are sometimes seen. For example, presynaptic muscarinic receptors of variable subtype are present on postganglionic parasympathetic nerve terminals. Since blockade of presynaptic receptors generally augments neurotransmitter release, the presynaptic effects of muscarinic antagonists may counteract their postsynaptic receptor blockade. Blockade of the modulatory muscarinic receptors in peripheral ganglia represents an additional mechanism for paradoxical responses.

An important consideration in the therapeutic use of muscarinic antagonists is the fact that physiological functions in different organs vary in their sensitivity to muscarinic receptor blockade (Table 9–2). Small doses of atropine depress salivary and bronchial secretion and sweating. With larger doses, the pupil dilates, accommodation of the lens to near vision is inhibited, and vagal effects on the heart are blocked so that the heart rate increases. Larger doses antagonize parasympathetic control of the urinary bladder and GI tract, thereby inhibiting micturition and decreasing intestinal tone and motility. Still larger doses are required to inhibit gastric motility and particularly secretion. Thus, doses of atropine and most related muscarinic antagonists that depress gastric secretion also almost invariably affect salivary secretion, ocular accommodation, micturition, and GI motility. This hierarchy of relative sensitivities is not a consequence of differences in the affinity of atropine for the muscarinic receptors at these sites because atropine lacks selectivity toward different muscarinic receptor subtypes. More likely determinants include the degree to which the functions of various end organs are regulated by parasympathetic tone, the "spareness" of receptors and signaling mechanisms, the involvement of intramural neurons and reflexes, and the presence of other regulatory mechanisms.

Most clinically available muscarinic antagonists are nonselective and their actions differ little from those of atropine, the prototype of the group. No subtype-selective antagonist, including pirenzepine, is completely selective (i.e., can be used to define a single receptor subtype relative to all other receptor subtypes). In fact, the clinical efficacy of some agents may arise from a balance of antagonistic actions on two or more receptor subtypes.

History. The naturally occurring muscarinic receptor antagonists atropine and scopolamine are alkaloids of the belladonna (Solanaceae) plants. Preparations of belladonna were known to the ancient Hindus and have long been used by physicians. During the time of the Roman Empire and in the Middle Ages, the deadly nightshade shrub was frequently used to produce an obscure and often prolonged poisoning, prompting Linnaeus to name the shrub Atropa belladonna, after Atropos, the oldest of the three Fates, who cuts the thread of life. The name belladonna derives from the alleged use of this preparation by Italian women to dilate their pupils; modern-day fashion models are known to use this same device for visual appeal. Atropine (d,l-hyoscyamine) also is found in Datura stramonium (Jamestown or jimson weed). Scopolamine (l-hyoscine) is found chiefly in Hyoscyamus niger(henbane). In India, the root and leaves of jimson weed were burned and the smoke inhaled to treat asthma. British colonists observed this ritual and introduced the belladonna alkaloids into western medicine in the early 1800s.

Accurate study of the actions of belladonna dates from the isolation of atropine in pure form by Mein in 1831. Bezold and Bloebaum (1867) showed that atropine blocked the cardiac effects of vagal stimulation, and Heidenhain (1872) found that it prevented salivary secretion produced by stimulation of the chorda tympani. Many semisynthetic congeners of the belladonna alkaloids and a large number of synthetic muscarinic receptor antagonists have been prepared, primarily with the objective of altering GI or bladder activity without causing dry mouth or pupillary dilation.

Chemistry. Atropine and scopolamine are esters formed by combination of an aromatic acid, tropic acid, and complex organic bases, either tropine (tropanol) or scopine. Scopine differs from tropine only in having an oxygen bridge between the carbon atoms designated as 6 and 7 (Figure 9–2). Homatropine is a semisynthetic compound produced by combining the base tropine with mandelic acid. The corresponding quaternary ammonium derivatives, modified by the addition of a second methyl group to the nitrogen, are methylatropine nitrate, methscopolamine bromide, and homatropine methylbromide. Ipratropium and tiotropium also are quaternary tropine analogs esterified with synthetic aromatic acids. A similar agent, oxitropium bromide, an N-ethyl-substituted, quaternary derivative of scopolamine, is available in Europe.

Structure-Activity Relationships. An intact ester of tropine and tropic acid is essential for antimuscarinic action, since neither the free acid nor the basic alcohol exhibits significant antimuscarinic activity. The presence of a free OH group in the acyl portion of the ester also is important for activity. When given parenterally, quaternary ammonium derivatives of atropine and scopolamine are generally more potent than their parent compounds in both muscarinic and ganglionic (nicotinic) blocking activities. The quaternary derivatives, when given orally, are poorly and unreliably absorbed.

Both tropic and mandelic acids have an enantiomeric center (boldface red C in the formulas in Figure 9–2). Scopolamine is l-hyoscine and is much more active than d-hyoscine. Atropine is racemized during extraction and consists of d,l-hyoscyamine, but antimuscarinic activity is almost wholly due to the naturally occurring l isomer. Synthetic derivatives show a wide range of structures that spatially replicate the aromatic acid and the bridged nitrogen of the tropine.

Mechanism of Action. Atropine and related compounds compete with ACh and other muscarinic agonists for a common binding site on the muscarinic receptor. Since antagonism by atropine is competitive, it can be overcome if the concentration of ACh at muscarinic receptors of the effector organ is increased sufficiently. Muscarinic receptor antagonists inhibit responses to postganglionic cholinergic nerve stimulation less effectively than they inhibit responses to injected choline esters. The difference may be explained by the fact that release of ACh by cholinergic nerve terminals occurs in close proximity to the receptors, resulting in very high concentrations of the transmitter at the receptors.

Figure 9–2.

Structural formulas of the belladonna alkaloids and semisynthetic and synthetic analogs. The red C identifies an asymmetric carbon atom.

View Full Size||Download Slide (.ppt)

Pharmacological Effects of Muscarinic Antagonists

The pharmacological effects of atropine, the prototypical muscarinic antagonist, provide a good background for understanding the therapeutic uses of the various muscarinic antagonists. The effects of other muscarinic antagonists will be mentioned only when they differ significantly from those of atropine. The major pharmacological effects of increasing doses of atropine, summarized in Table 9–2, offer a general guide to the problems associated with administration of this class of agents.

Cardiovascular System

Heart. The main effect of atropine on the heart is to alter the rate. Although the dominant response is tachycardia, the heart rate often decreases transiently with average clinical doses (0.4-0.6 mg; Table 9–2). The slowing is modest (4-8 beats per minute) and is usually absent after rapid intravenous injection. There are no accompanying changes in blood pressure or cardiac output. This unexpected effect has been attributed to the block of presynaptic M₁ muscarinic receptors on parasympathetic postganglionic nerve terminals in the SA node, which normally inhibit ACh release (Wellstein and Pitschner, 1988).

Table 9-2Effects of Atropine in Relation to Dose

View Table||Download (.pdf)

Table 9-2 Effects of Atropine in Relation to Dose

DOSE (mg)

EFFECTS

0.5

Slight cardiac slowing; some dryness of mouth; inhibition of sweating

Definite dryness of mouth; thirst; acceleration of heart, sometimes preceded by slowing; mild dilation of pupils

Rapid heart rate; palpitation; marked dryness of mouth; dilated pupils; some blurring of near vision

Above symptoms marked; difficulty in speaking and swallowing; restlessness and fatigue; headache; dry, hot skin; ?difficulty in micturition; reduced ?intestinal peristalsis

≥10

Above symptoms more marked; pulse rapid and weak; iris practically obliterated; vision very blurred; skin flushed, hot, dry, and scarlet; ataxia, restlessness, and excitement; hallucinations and delirium; coma

The clinical picture of a high (toxic) dose of atropine may be remembered by an old mnemonic device that summarizes the symptoms: Red as a beet, Dry as a bone, Blind as a bat, Hot as firestone, and Mad as a hatter.

Larger doses of atropine cause progressive tachycardia by blocking M₂ receptors on the SA nodal pacemaker cells, thereby antagonizing parasympathetic (vagal) tone to the heart. The resting heart rate is increased by ~35-40 beats per minute in young men given 2 mg of atropine intramuscularly. The maximal heart rate (e.g., in response to exercise) is not altered by atropine. The influence of atropine is most noticeable in healthy young adults, in whom vagal tone is considerable. In infancy and old age, even large doses of atropine may fail to accelerate the heart. Atropine often produces cardiac arrhythmias, but without significant cardiovascular symptoms.

Atropine can abolish many types of reflex vagal cardiac slowing or asystole, such as from inhalation of irritant vapors, stimulation of the carotid sinus, pressure on the eyeballs, peritoneal stimulation, or injection of contrast dye during cardiac catheterization. Atropine also prevents or abruptly abolishes bradycardia or asystole caused by choline esters, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, or other parasympathomimetic drugs, as well as cardiac arrest from electrical stimulation of the vagus.

The removal of vagal tone to the heart by atropine also may facilitate AV conduction. Atropine shortens the functional refractory period of the AV node and can increase ventricular rate in patients who have atrial fibrillation or flutter. In certain cases of second-degree AV block (e.g., Wenckebach AV block), in which vagal activity is an etiological factor (as with digitalis toxicity), atropine may lessen the degree of block. In some patients with complete AV block, the idioventricular rate may be accelerated by atropine; in others it is stabilized. Atropine may improve the clinical condition of patients with inferior or posterior wall myocardial infarction by relieving severe sinus or nodal bradycardia or AV block.

Circulation. Atropine, in clinical doses, completely counteracts the peripheral vasodilation and sharp fall in blood pressure caused by choline esters. In contrast, when given alone, its effect on blood vessels and blood pressure is neither striking nor constant. This result is expected because most vascular beds lack significant cholinergic innervation. In toxic and occasionally in therapeutic doses, atropine can dilate cutaneous blood vessels, especially those in the blush area (atropine flush). This may be a compensatory reaction permitting the radiation of heat to offset the atropine-induced rise in temperature that can accompany inhibition of sweating.

Respiratory System. Although atropine can cause some bronchodilation and decrease in tracheobronchial secretion in normal individuals by blocking parasympathetic (vagal) tone to the lungs, its effects on the respiratory system are most significant in patients with respiratory disease. Atropine can inhibit the bronchoconstriction caused by histamine, bradykinin, and the eicosanoids, which presumably reflects the participation of reflex parasympathetic (vagal) activity in the bronchoconstriction elicited by these agents. The ability to block the indirect bronchoconstrictive effects of these mediators forms the basis for the use of muscarinic receptor antagonists, along with β adrenergic receptor agonists, in the treatment of asthma (Chapter 36). Muscarinic antagonists also have an important role in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Chapter 36).

Atropine inhibits the secretions of the nose, mouth, pharynx, and bronchi, and thus dries the mucous membranes of the respiratory tract. This action is especially marked if secretion is excessive and formed the basis for the use of atropine and other muscarinic antagonists to prevent irritating inhalational anesthetics such as diethyl ether from increasing bronchial secretion. While the newer inhalational anesthetics are less irritating, muscarinic antagonists are similarly used to decrease the rhinorrhea associated with the common cold or with allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Reduction of mucous secretion and mucociliary clearance can, however, result in mucus plugs, a potentially undesirable side effect of muscarinic antagonists in patients with airway disease.

Eye. Muscarinic receptor antagonists block the cholinergic responses of the pupillary sphincter muscle of the iris and the ciliary muscle controlling lens curvature (Chapter 64). Thus, they dilate the pupil (mydriasis) and paralyze accommodation (cycloplegia). The wide pupillary dilation results in photophobia; the lens is fixed for far vision, near objects are blurred, and objects may appear smaller than they are. The normal pupillary reflex constriction to light or upon convergence of the eyes is abolished. These effects can occur after either local or systemic administration of the alkaloids.

However, conventional systemic doses of atropine (0.6 mg) have little ocular effect, in contrast to equal doses of scopolamine, which cause evident mydriasis and loss of accommodation. Locally applied atropine produces ocular effects of considerable duration; accommodation and pupillary reflexes may not fully recover for 7-12 days. Other muscarinic receptor antagonists with shorter durations of action are therefore preferred as mydriatics in ophthalmologic practice (Chapter 64). Pilocarpine and choline esters (e.g., carbachol) in sufficient concentrations can reverse the ocular effects of atropine.

Muscarinic receptor antagonists administered systemically have little effect on intraocular pressure except in patients predisposed to angle-closure glaucoma, in whom the pressure may occasionally rise dangerously. The rise in pressure occurs when the anterior chamber is narrow and the iris obstructs outflow of aqueous humor into the trabeculae. Muscarinic antagonists may precipitate a first attack in unrecognized cases of this relatively rare condition. In patients with open-angle glaucoma, an acute rise in pressure is unusual. Atropine-like drugs generally can be used safely in this latter condition, particularly if the glaucoma is being treated appropriately.

GI Tract. Knowledge of the actions of muscarinic receptor agonists on the stomach and intestine led to the use of muscarinic receptor antagonists as antispasmodic agents for GI disorders and in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Although atropine can completely abolish the effects of ACh (and other parasympathomimetic drugs) on GI motility and secretion, it inhibits only incompletely the gastrointestinal responses to vagal stimulation. This difference, which is particularly striking in the effects of atropine on gut motility, can be attributed to the fact that preganglionic vagal fibers innervating the GI tract synapse not only with postganglionic cholinergic fibers, but also with a network of noncholinergic intramural neurons. These neurons, which form the plexuses of the enteric nervous system, utilize numerous neurotransmitters or neuromodulators including serotonin (5-HT), dopamine, and peptides, the effects of which are not blocked by atropine. Another reason that atropine only incompletely inhibits the GI responses to vagal activity is that vagal stimulation of gastrin secretion is mediated by gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), not ACh. The parietal cell secretes acid in response to at least three agonists: gastrin, histamine, and acetylcholine; furthermore, stimulation of muscarinic receptors on enterochromaffin-like cells will cause histamine release. Atropine will inhibit the component of acid secretion that results from muscarinic stimulation of enterochromafin cells (histamine secretors) and parietal cells (acid secretors).

Secretions. Salivary secretion is particularly sensitive to inhibition by muscarinic receptor antagonists, which can completely abolish the copious, watery secretion induced by parasympathetic stimulation. The mouth becomes dry, and swallowing and talking may become difficult. Gastric secretion during the cephalic and fasting phases is also reduced markedly by muscarinic receptor antagonists. In contrast, the intestinal phase of gastric secretion is only partially inhibited. The concentration of acid is not necessarily lowered because secretion of HCO₃^–as well as that of H⁺ is blocked. The gastric cells that secrete mucin and proteolytic enzymes are more directly under vagal influence than are the acid-secreting cells, and atropine decreases their secretory function. Although muscarinic antagonists can reduce gastric secretion, the doses required also affect salivary secretion, ocular accommodation, micturition, and GI motility (Table 9–2). Thus, histamine H₂ receptor antagonists and, more recently, proton pump inhibitors have replaced muscarinic antagonists as inhibitors of acid secretion (Chapter 45).

In contrast to most muscarinic receptor antagonists, pirenzepine, which shows some selectivity for M₁ receptors, inhibits gastric acid secretion at doses that have little effect on salivation or heart rate. Since the muscarinic receptors on the parietal cells are primarily M₃ receptors and do not appear to have a high affinity for pirenzepine, the M₁ receptor responsible for alterations in gastric acid secretion is postulated to be localized in intramural ganglia (Eglen et al., 1996). Blockade of ganglionic muscarinic receptors (rather than those at the neuroeffector junction) may underlie the ability of pirenzepine to inhibit the relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. The physiology and pharmacology here are complex: Pirenzepine reportedly inhibits carbachol-stimulated acid secretion in KO mice lacking M₁ receptors (Aihara et al., 2005).

Motility. The parasympathetic nerves enhance both tone and motility and relax sphincters, thereby favoring the passage of gastrointestinal contents. Both in normal subjects and in patients with gastrointestinal disease, muscarinic antagonists produce prolonged inhibitory effects on the motor activity of the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon, characterized by a reduction in tone and in amplitude and frequency of peristaltic contractions. Relatively large doses are needed to produce such inhibition. This probably can be explained by the ability of the enteric nervous system to regulate motility independently of parasympathetic control; parasympathetic nerves serve only to modulate the effects of the enteric nervous system (Chapter 8).

Other Smooth Muscle

Urinary Tract. Muscarinic antagonists decrease the normal tone and amplitude of contractions of the ureter and bladder, and often eliminate drug-induced enhancement of ureteral tone. However, this inhibition cannot be achieved in the absence of inhibition of salivation and lacrimation and blurring of vision (Table 9–2).

Biliary Tract. Atropine exerts a mild antispasmodic action on the gallbladder and bile ducts in humans. However, this effect usually is not sufficient to overcome or prevent the marked spasm and increase in biliary duct pressure induced by opioids. The nitrates (Chapter 27) are more effective than atropine in this respect.

Sweat Glands and Temperature Small doses of atropine inhibit the activity of sweat glands innervated by sympathetic cholinergic fibers, and the skin becomes hot and dry. Sweating may be depressed enough to raise the body temperature, but only notably so after large doses or at high environmental temperatures.

Central Nervous System Atropine has minimal effects on the CNS at therapeutic doses, although mild stimulation of the parasympathetic medullary centers may occur. With toxic doses of atropine, central excitation becomes more prominent, leading to restlessness, irritability, disorientation, hallucinations, or delirium (see the discussion of atropine poisoning later in the chapter). With still larger doses, stimulation is followed by depression, leading to circulatory collapse and respiratory failure after a period of paralysis and coma.

In contrast to atropine, scopolamine has prominent central effects at low therapeutic doses; atropine therefore is preferred over scopolamine for many purposes. The basis for this difference is probably the greater permeation of scopolamine across the blood-brain barrier. Specifically, scopolamine in therapeutic doses normally causes CNS depression manifest as drowsiness, amnesia, fatigue, and dreamless sleep, with a reduction in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. It also causes euphoria and can therefore be subject to abuse. The depressant and amnesic effects formerly were sought when scopolamine was used as an adjunct to anesthetic agents or for preanesthetic medication. However, in the presence of severe pain, the same doses of scopolamine can occasionally cause excitement, restlessness, hallucinations, or delirium. These excitatory effects resemble those of toxic doses of atropine. Scopolamine also is effective in preventing motion sickness, probably by blocking neural pathways from the vestibular apparatus in the inner ear to the emetic center in the brainstem.

Muscarinic receptor antagonists have long been used in the treatment of Parkinson disease. These agents can be effective adjuncts to treatment with levodopa (Chapter 22). Muscarinic receptor antagonists also are used to treat the extrapyramidal symptoms that commonly occur as side effects of conventional antipsychotic drug therapy (Chapter 16). Certain antipsychotic drugs are relatively potent muscarinic receptor antagonists (Richelson, 1999; Roth et al., 2004) and, perhaps for this reason, cause fewer extrapyramidal side effects.

Ipratropium and Tiotropium

The quaternary ammonium compounds ipratropium and tiotropium are used exclusively for their effects on the respiratory tract. When inhaled, their action is confined almost completely to the mouth and airways. Dry mouth is the only frequently reported side effect, as the absorption of these drugs from the lungs or the GI tract is very inefficient. The degree of bronchodilation achieved by these agents is thought to reflect the level of basal parasympathetic tone, supplemented by reflex activation of cholinergic pathways brought about by various stimuli. In normal individuals, inhalation of the drugs can provide virtually complete protection against the bronchoconstriction produced by the subsequent inhalation of such irritants as sulfur dioxide, ozone, or cigarette smoke. However, patients with atopic asthma or patients with demonstrable bronchial hyperresponsiveness are less well protected. Although these drugs cause a marked reduction in sensitivity to methacholine in asthmatic subjects, more modest inhibition of responses to challenge with histamine, bradykinin, or PGF_2α is achieved, and little protection is afforded against the bronchoconstriction induced by 5-HT or leukotrienes. A therapeutically important property of ipratropium and tiotropium is their minimal inhibitory effect on mucociliary clearance relative to atropine. Hence, the choice of these agents for use in patients with airway disease minimizes the increased accumulation of lower airway secretions encountered with atropine.

Ipratropium appears to block all subtypes of muscarinic receptors and accordingly also antagonizes the inhibition of ACh release by presynaptic M₂ receptors on parasympathetic postganglionic nerve terminals in the lung; the resulting increase in ACh release may counteract its blockade of M₃ receptor-mediated bronchoconstriction. In contrast, tiotropium shows some selectivity for M₁ and M₃ receptors; its lower affinity for M₂ receptors minimizes its presynaptic effect to enhance ACh release (Barnes, 2004; Disse et al., 1999)

Absorption, Distribution, and Elimination. The belladonna alkaloids and the tertiary synthetic and semisynthetic derivatives are absorbed rapidly from the GI tract. They also enter the circulation when applied locally to the mucosal surfaces of the body. Absorption from intact skin is limited, although efficient absorption does occur in the postauricular region for some agents (e.g., scopolamine, allowing delivery by transdermal patch). Systemic absorption of inhaled or orally ingested quaternary muscarinic receptor antagonists is limited. The quaternary ammonium derivatives of the belladonna alkaloids also penetrate the conjunctiva of the eye less readily, and central effects are lacking because the quaternary agents do not cross the blood-brain barrier. Atropine has a t_1/2 of ~4 hours; hepatic metabolism accounts for the elimination of about half of a dose; the remainder is excreted unchanged in the urine.

Ipratropium is administered as an aerosol or solution for inhalation whereas tiotropium is administered as a dry powder. As with most drugs administered by inhalation, ~90% of the dose is swallowed. Most of the swallowed drug appears in the feces. After inhalation, maximal responses usually develop over 30-90 minutes, with tiotropium having the slower onset. The effects of ipratropium last for 4-6 hours, while tiotropium's effects persist for 24 hours so that the drug is amenable to once-daily dosing (Barnes and Hansel, 2004).

Therapeutic Uses of Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists

Muscarinic receptor antagonists have been used in the treatment of a wide variety of clinical conditions, predominantly to inhibit effects of parasympathetic activity in the respiratory tract, urinary tract, GI tract, eye, and heart. Their CNS effects have resulted in their use in the treatment of Parkinson disease, the management of extrapyramidal side effects of antipsychotic drugs, and the prevention of motion sickness. The major limitation in the use of the nonselective drugs is often failure to obtain desired therapeutic responses without concomitant side effects. While the latter usually are not serious, they can be sufficiently disturbing to decrease patient compliance, particularly during long-term administration. To date, selectivity has mainly been achieved by local administration, e.g., by pulmonary inhalation or instillation in the eye, since few available muscarinic antagonists show absolute selectivity. The development of allosteric modulators that recognize sites unique to particular receptor subtypes is currently considered an important approach to the development of selective drugs for the treatment of specific clinical conditions (Conn et al., 2009b).

Respiratory Tract. Ipratropium (atrovent, others) and tiotropium (spiriva) are important agents in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; they are less effective in most asthmatic patients (Barnes, 2004; Barnes and Hansel, 2004; Gross, 2004). These agents often are used with inhaled long-acting β₂ adrenergic receptor agonists, although there is little evidence of true synergism. Ipratropium is administered four times daily via a metered-dose inhaler or nebulizer; tiotropium is administered once daily via a dry powder inhaler. The therapeutic uses of ipratropium and tiotropium are discussed further in Chapter 36.

Ipratropium also is FDA-approved for use in nasal inhalers for the treatment of the rhinorrhea associated with the common cold or with allergic or nonallergic perennial rhinitis. Although the ability of muscarinic antagonists to reduce nasopharyngeal secretions may provide some symptomatic relief, such therapy does not affect the natural course of the condition. It is probable that the contribution of first-generation antihistamines employed in nonprescription cold medications is due primarily to their antimuscarinic properties, except in conditions with an allergic basis (Chapter 32). The uncomplicated common cold will generally last 2 weeks if treated and 14 days if untreated; cold medications may, however, ameliorate some of the symptoms.

Genitourinary Tract. Overactive urinary bladder can be successfully treated with muscarinic receptor antagonists. These agents can lower intravesicular pressure, increase capacity, and reduce the frequency of contractions by antagonizing parasympathetic control of the bladder; they also may alter bladder sensation during filling (Chapple et al., 2005). Muscarinic antagonists can be used to treat enuresis in children, particularly when a progressive increase in bladder capacity is the objective, and to reduce urinary frequency and increase bladder capacity in spastic paraplegia (Chapple, 2000; Goessl et al., 2000).

The muscarinic receptor antagonists indicated for overactive bladder are oxybutynin (ditropan, others), tolterodine (detrol), trospium chloride (sanctura), darifenacin (enablex), solifenacin (vesicare), and fesoterodine (toviaz); available preparations and dosages are summarized in Table 9–3. Although some comparison trials have demonstrated small but statistically significant differences in efficacy between agents (Chapple et al., 2005), whether these efficacy differences are clinically significant is uncertain. The most important adverse reactions are consequences of muscarinic receptor blockade and include xerostomia, blurred vision, and GI side effects such as constipation and dyspepsia. CNS-related antimuscarinic effects, including drowsiness, dizziness, and confusion, can occur and are particularly problematic in elderly patients. CNS effects appear to be less likely with trospium, a quaternary amine, and with darifenacin and solifenacin; the latter agents are relatively selective for M₃ receptors and therefore have minimal effects on M₁ receptors in the CNS, which appear to play an important role in memory and cognition (Kay et al., 2006). Adverse effects can limit the tolerability of these drugs with continued use, and patient acceptance declines. Xerostomia is the most common reason for discontinuation.

Oxybutynin, the oldest of the antimuscarinics currently used to treat overactive bladder disorders, is associated with a high incidence of antimuscarinic side effects, particularly xerostomia. In an attempt to increase patient acceptance, oxybutynin is marketed as a transdermal system (oxytrol) that is associated with a lower incidence of side effects than the oral immediate- or extended-release formulations; a topical gel formulation of oxybutynin (gelnique) also appears to offer a more favorable side effect profile. Because of the extensive metabolism of oral oxybutynin by enteric and hepatic CYP3A4, higher doses are used in oral than transdermal administration; the dose may need to be reduced in patients taking drugs that inhibit CYP3A4.

Tolterodine shows selectivity for the urinary bladder in animal models and in clinical studies, resulting in greater patient acceptance; however, studies on isolated receptors do not reveal a unique subtype selectivity (Abrams et al., 1998, 1999; Chapple, 2000). Inhibition of a particular complement of receptors in the bladder may give rise to synergism and clinical efficacy. Tolterodine is metabolized by CYP2D6 to 5-hydroxymethyltolterodine. Since this metabolite possesses similar activity to the parent drug, variations in CYP2D6 levels do not affect the net antimuscarinic activity or duration of action of the drug. However, in patients who poorly metabolize tolterodine via CYP2D6, the CYP3A4 pathway becomes important in tolterodine elimination. Because it is often difficult to assess which patients will be poor metabolizers, tolterodine doses may need to be reduced in patients taking drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 (dosage adjustments generally are not necessary in patients taking drugs that inhibit CYP2D6). Patients with significant renal or hepatic impairment also should receive lower doses of the drug. Fesoterodine, a new agent, is a prodrug that is rapidly hydrolyzed to the active metabolite of tolterodine.

Trospium, a quaternary amine, is as effective as oxybutynin with better tolerability. Trospium is the only antimuscarinic used for overactive bladder that is eliminated primarily by the kidneys; 60% of the absorbed trospium dose is excreted unchanged in the urine, and dosage adjustment is necessary for patients with impaired renal function.

Solifenacin is relatively selective for muscarinic receptors of the M₃ subtype, giving it a favorable efficacy:side effect ratio (Chapple et al., 2004). Solifenacin is significantly metabolized by CYP3A4; thus, patients taking drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 should receive lower doses.

Like solifenacin, darifenacin is relatively selective for M₃ receptors. It is metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4; as with tolterodine, the latter pathway becomes more important in patients who poorly metabolize the drug by CYP2D6. Darifenacin doses may need to be reduced in patients taking drugs that inhibit either of these CYPs.

Flavoxate hydrochloride, a drug with direct spasmolytic actions on smooth muscle, especially of the urinary tract, is used for the relief of dysuria, urgency, nocturia, and other urinary symptoms associated with genitourinary disorders (e.g., cystitis, prostatitis, urethritis). Flavoxate also has weak antihistaminic, local anesthetic, analgesic, and, at high doses, antimuscarinic effects.

Table 9-3Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists Used in the Treatment of Overactive Urinary Bladder

View Table||Download (.pdf)

Table 9-3 Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists Used in the Treatment of Overactive Urinary Bladder

NONPROPRIETARY NAME

TRADE NAME

t_1/2 (HOURS)

PREPARATIONS^a

DAILY DOSE (ADULT)

Oxybutynin

ditropan, others

2-5

10-20 mg^b

oxytrol

5-30 mg^b

gelnique

Transdermal patch

3.9 mg

Topical gel

100 mg

Tolterodine

DETROL

2-9.6^c

2-4 mg^b,d

6.9-18^c

4 mg^b,d

Trospium chloride

sanctura

20-40 mg^e

60 mg^e

Solifenacin

vesicare

5-10 mg^b

Darifenacin

enablex

13-19

7.5-15 mg^f

Fesoterodine

toviaz

4-8 mg

^aPreparations are designated as follows: IR, immediate-release tablet; ER, extended-release tablet or capsule.

^bDoses may need to be reduced in patients taking drugs that inhibit CYP3A4.

^cLonger times in indicated ranges are seen in poor metabolizers.

^dDoses should be reduced in patients with significant renal or hepatic impairment.

^eDoses should be reduced in patients with significant renal impairment; dosage adjustments also may be needed in patients with hepatic impairment.

^fDoses may need to be reduced in patients taking drugs that inhibit CYPs 3A4 or 2D6.

GI Tract. Muscarinic receptor antagonists were once widely used for the management of peptic ulcer. Although they can reduce gastric motility and the secretion of gastric acid, antisecretory doses produce pronounced side effects, such as xerostomia, loss of visual accommodation, photophobia, and difficulty in urination (Table 9–2). As a consequence, patient compliance in the long-term management of symptoms of acid-peptic disease with these drugs is poor.

Pirenzepine, a tricyclic drug similar in structure to imipramine, has selectivity for M₁ over M₂ and M₃ receptors (Caulfield, 1993; Caulfield and Birdsall, 1998). However, pirenzepine's affinities for M₁ and M₄ receptors are comparable, so it does not possess total M₁ selectivity. Telenzepine, an analog of pirenzepine, has higher potency and similar selectivity for M₁ muscarinic receptors. Both drugs are used in the treatment of acid-peptic disease in Europe, Japan, and Canada, but not currently in the U.S. At therapeutic doses of pirenzepine, the incidence of xerostomia, blurred vision, and central muscarinic disturbances is relatively low. Central effects are not seen because of the drug's limited penetration into the CNS.

Most studies indicate that pirenzepine (100-150 mg per day) produces about the same rate of healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers as the H₂ receptor antagonists cimetidine or ranitidine; it also may be effective in preventing the recurrence of ulcers (Carmine and Brogden, 1985; Tryba and Cook, 1997). Side effects necessitate drug withdrawal in <1% of patients. Studies in human subjects have shown pirenzepine to be more potent in inhibiting gastric acid secretion produced by neural stimuli than by muscarinic agonists, supporting the postulated localization of M₁ receptors at ganglionic sites. Nevertheless, H₂ receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors generally are considered to be the current drugs of choice to reduce gastric acid secretion (Chapter 45).

Myriad conditions known or supposed to involve increased tone (spasticity) or motility of the GI tract are treated with belladonna alkaloids (e.g., atropine, hyoscyamine sulfate [anaspaz, others], and scopolamine) alone or in combination with sedatives (e.g., phenobarbital [donnatal, others]) or antianxiety agents (e.g., chlordiazepoxide [librax]). The belladonna alkaloids and their synthetic substitutes can reduce tone and motility when administered in maximally tolerated doses, and they might be expected to be efficacious in conditions simply involving excessive smooth muscle contraction, a point that is often in doubt. M₃-selective antagonists might achieve more selectivity but are unlikely to be better tolerated, as M₃ receptors also have an important role in the control of salivation, bronchial secretion and contraction, and bladder motility. Glycopyrrolate (robinul, others), a muscarinic antagonist that is structurally unrelated to the belladonna alkaloids, also is used to reduce GI tone and motility; being a quaternary amine, it is less likely to cause adverse CNS effects than atropine, scopolamine, and other tertiary amines. Alternative agents for treatment of increased GI motility and its associated symptoms are discussed in Chapter 46.

Diarrhea associated with irritation of the lower bowel, such as mild dysenteries and diverticulitis, may respond to atropine-like drugs, an effect that likely involves actions on ion transport as well as motility. However, more severe conditions such as Salmonella dysentery, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease respond little if at all to muscarinic antagonists. The belladonna alkaloids and synthetic substitutes are very effective in reducing excessive salivation, such as drug-induced salivation and that associated with heavy-metal poisoning and Parkinson disease.

Dicyclomine hydrochloride (bentyl, others) is a weak muscarinic receptor antagonist that also has nonspecific direct spasmolytic effects on smooth muscle of the GI tract. It is occasionally used in the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

Eye. Effects limited to the eye are obtained by topical administration of muscarinic receptor antagonists to produce mydriasis and cycloplegia. Cycloplegia is not attainable without mydriasis and requires higher concentrations or more prolonged application of a given agent. Mydriasis often is necessary for thorough examination of the retina and optic disc and in the therapy of iridocyclitis and keratitis. The belladonna mydriatics may be alternated with miotics for breaking or preventing the development of adhesions between the iris and the lens. Complete cycloplegia may be necessary in the treatment of iridocyclitis and choroiditis and for accurate measurement of refractive errors.

Homatropine hydrobromide (isopto homatropine, others), a semisynthetic derivative of atropine (Figure 9–2), cyclopentolate hydrochloride (cyclogyl, others), and tropicamide (mydriacyl, others) are agents used in ophthalmological practice. These agents are preferred to topical atropine or scopolamine because of their shorter duration of action. Additional information on the ophthalmological properties and preparations of these and other drugs is provided in Chapter 64.

Cardiovascular System. The cardiovascular effects of muscarinic receptor antagonists are of limited clinical utility. Generally, these agents are used only in coronary care units for short-term interventions or in surgical settings.

Atropine may be considered in the initial treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction in whom excessive vagal tone causes sinus bradycardia or AV nodal block. Sinus bradycardia is the most common arrhythmia seen during acute myocardial infarction of the inferior or posterior wall. Atropine may prevent further clinical deterioration in cases of high vagal tone or AV block by restoring heart rate to a level sufficient to maintain adequate hemodynamic status and to eliminate AV nodal block. Dosing must be judicious; doses that are too low can cause a paradoxical bradycardia (described earlier), while excessive doses will cause tachycardia that may extend the infarct by increasing the demand for oxygen.

Atropine occasionally is useful in reducing the severe bradycardia and syncope associated with a hyperactive carotid sinus reflex. It has little effect on most ventricular rhythms. In some patients, atropine may eliminate premature ventricular contractions associated with a very slow atrial rate. It also may reduce the degree of AV block when increased vagal tone is a major factor in the conduction defect, such as the second-degree AV block that can be produced by digitalis. Selective M₂ receptor antagonists would be of potential utility in blocking ACh-mediated bradycardia or AV block; however, none is currently available for clinical use.

Central Nervous System. The belladonna alkaloids were among the first drugs to be used in the prevention of motion sickness. Scopolamine is the most effective prophylactic agent for short (4-6 hour) exposures to severe motion, and probably for exposures of up to several days. All agents used to combat motion sickness should be given prophylactically; they are much less effective after severe nausea or vomiting has developed. A transdermal preparation of scopolamine (transderm scop) has been shown to be highly effective when used prophylactically for the prevention of motion sickness. The drug, incorporated into a multilayered adhesive unit, is applied to the postauricular mastoid region, an area where transdermal absorption of the drug is especially efficient, resulting in the delivery of ~ 0.5 mg of scopolamine over 72 hours.

Xerostomia is common, drowsiness is not infrequent, and blurred vision occurs in some individuals. Mydriasis and cycloplegia can occur by inadvertent transfer of the drug to the eye from the fingers after handling the patch. Rare but severe psychotic episodes have been reported. As noted earlier, the preoperative use of scopolamine to produce tranquilization and amnesia is no longer recommended. Given alone in the presence of pain or severe anxiety, scopolamine may induce outbursts of uncontrolled behavior.

For many years, the belladonna alkaloids and subsequently synthetic substitutes were the only agents helpful in the treatment of Parkinson disease. Levodopa combined with carbidopa (sinemet) and dopamine receptor agonists are currently the most important treatments for Parkinson disease, but alternative or concurrent therapy with muscarinic receptor antagonists may be required in some patients (Chapter 22). Centrally acting muscarinic antagonists are efficacious in preventing extrapyramidal side effects such as dystonias or parkinsonian symptoms in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs (Chapter 16). The muscarinic antagonists used for Parkinson disease and drug-induced extrapyramidal symptoms include benztropine mesylate (COGENTIN, others), trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride (ARTANE, others), and biperiden; all are tertiary amines that readily gain access to the CNS.

Current evidence based on studies using muscarinic receptor knockout mice, subtype-selective drugs, and early-stage clinical trials suggest that selective blockade of specific muscarinic receptor subtypes in the CNS may have important therapeutic applications. For example, selective M₁ and M₄ muscarinic antagonists may be efficacious for the treatment of Parkinson disease with fewer side effects than nonselective muscarinic antagonists, while selective M₃ antagonists may be useful in the treatment of obesity and associated metabolic abnormalities (Wess et al., 2007).

Uses in Anesthesia. The use of anesthetics that are relatively non-irritating to the bronchi has virtually eliminated the need for prophylactic use of muscarinic receptor antagonists. Atropine commonly is given to block responses to vagal reflexes induced by surgical manipulation of visceral organs. Atropine or glycopyrrolate is used with neostigmine to block its parasympathomimetic effects when the latter agent is used to reverse skeletal muscle relaxation after surgery (Chapter 11). Serious cardiac arrhythmias have occasionally occurred, perhaps because of the initial bradycardia produced by atropine combined with the cholinomimetic effects of neostigmine.

Anticholinesterase Poisoning. The use of atropine in large doses for the treatment of poisoning by anticholinesterase organophosphorus insecticides is discussed in Chapter 10. Atropine also may be used to antagonize the parasympathomimetic effects of pyridostigmine or other anticholinesterases administered in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. It does not interfere with the salutary effects at the skeletal neuromuscular junction. It is most useful early in therapy, before tolerance to muscarinic side effects of anticholinesterases have developed.

Other Therapeutic Uses of Muscarinic Antagonists. Methscopolamine bromide (pamine) is a quaternary ammonium derivative of scopolamine and therefore lacks the central actions of scopolamine. Although formerly used to treat peptic ulcer disease, at present it is primarily used in certain combination products for the temporary relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, and the common cold.

Homatropine methylbromide, the methyl derivative of homatropine, is less potent than atropine in antimuscarinic activity but four times more potent as a ganglionic blocking agent. Formerly used for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease, at present it is primarily used with hydrocodone as an antitussive combination (hycodan, others).

Contraindications and Adverse Effects

Most contraindications, precautions, and adverse effects are predictable consequences of muscarinic receptor blockade: xerostomia, constipation, blurred vision, dyspepsia, and cognitive impairment. Important contraindications to the use of muscarinic antagonists include urinary tract obstruction, GI obstruction, and uncontrolled (or susceptibility to attacks of) angle-closure glaucoma. Muscarinic receptor antagonists also are contraindicated (or should be used with extreme caution) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. These adverse effects and contraindications generally are of more limited concern with muscarinic antagonists that are administered by inhalation or used topically in ophthalmology.

Toxicology of Drugs with Antimuscarinic Properties

The deliberate or accidental ingestion of natural belladonna alkaloids is a major cause of poisonings. Many histamine H₁ receptor antagonists, phenothiazines, and tricyclic antidepressants also block muscarinic receptors, and in sufficient dosage, produce syndromes that include features of atropine intoxication.

Among the tricyclic antidepressants, protriptyline and amitriptyline are the most potent muscarinic receptor antagonists, with an affinity for the receptor that is ~ one-tenth of that reported for atropine. Since these drugs are administered in therapeutic doses considerably higher than the effective dose of atropine, antimuscarinic effects are often observed clinically (Chapter 15). In addition, overdose with suicidal intent is a danger in the population using antidepressants. Fortunately, most of the newer antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have more limited anticholinergic properties (Cusack et al., 1994).

Like the tricyclic antidepressants, many of the older antipsychotic drugs have antimuscarinic effects. These effects are most likely to be observed with the less potent drugs, e.g., chlorpromazine and thioridazine, which must be given in higher doses. The newer antipsychotic drugs, classified as "atypical" and characterized by their low propensity for inducing extrapyramidal side effects, also include agents that are potent muscarinic receptor antagonists. In particular, clozapine binds to human brain muscarinic receptors with high affinity (10 nM, compared to 1-2 nM for atropine); olanzapine also is a potent muscarinic receptor antagonist (Richelson, 1999; Roth et al., 2004). Accordingly, xerostomia is a prominent side effect of these drugs. A paradoxical side effect of clozapine is increased salivation and drooling, possibly the result of partial agonist properties of this drug (Richelson, 1999).

Infants and young children are especially susceptible to the toxic effects of muscarinic antagonists. Indeed, cases of intoxication in children have resulted from conjunctival instillation for ophthalmic refraction and other ocular effects. Systemic absorption occurs either from the nasal mucosa after the drug has traversed the nasolacrimal duct or from the GI tract if the drug is swallowed. Poisoning with diphenoxylate-atropine (lomotil, others), used to treat diarrhea, has been extensively reported in the pediatric literature. Transdermal preparations of scopolamine used for motion sickness have been noted to cause toxic psychoses, especially in children and in the elderly. Serious intoxication may occur in children who ingest berries or seeds containing belladonna alkaloids. Poisoning from ingestion and smoking of jimson weed is seen with some frequency today.

Table 9–2 shows the oral doses of atropine causing undesirable responses or symptoms of overdosage. These symptoms are predictable results of blockade of parasympathetic innervation. In cases of full-blown atropine poisoning, the syndrome may last 48 hours or longer. Intravenous injection of the anticholinesterase agent physostigmine may be used for confirmation. If physostigmine does not elicit the expected salivation, sweating, bradycardia, and intestinal hyperactivity, intoxication with atropine or a related agent is almost certain. Depression and circulatory collapse are evident only in cases of severe intoxication; the blood pressure declines, convulsions may ensue, respiration becomes inadequate, and death due to respiratory failure may follow after a period of paralysis and coma.

Measures to limit intestinal absorption should be initiated without delay if the poison has been taken orally. For symptomatic treatment, slow intravenous injection of physostigmine rapidly abolishes the delirium and coma caused by large doses of atropine, but carries some risk of overdose in mild atropine intoxication. Since physostigmine is metabolized rapidly, the patient may again lapse into coma within 1-2 hours, and repeated doses may be needed (Chapter 10). If marked excitement is present and more specific treatment is not available, a benzodiazepine is the most suitable agent for sedation and for control of convulsions. Phenothiazines or agents with antimuscarinic activity should not be used, because their antimuscarinic action is likely to intensify toxicity. Support of respiration and control of hyperthermia may be necessary. Ice bags and alcohol sponges help to reduce fever, especially in children.

CLINICAL SUMMARY

Listen

Drugs that target muscarinic receptors have a wide variety of therapeutic uses. For example, muscarinic agonists are used in the treatment of urinary retention and xerostomia; muscarinic antagonists are used in the treatment of overactive bladder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and increased GI motility; and both groups of agents have important uses in ophthalmology. The cloning of five distinct muscarinic receptor subtypes and their subsequent genetic deletion in mice has raised the expectation that one might greatly improve the therapeutic utility of drugs that interact with muscarinic receptors by the development of subtype-selective agonists and antagonists. By targeting unique subsets of receptors that control muscarinic responses within a particular organ, unwanted side effects that typify the use of these drugs could be avoided. Subtype-selective muscarinic receptor agonists and antagonists show particular promise in the treatment of CNS disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson disease. Although complete selectivity has been difficult to achieve, the development of allosteric modulators may allow enhanced selectivity and new therapeutic uses in the future.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Listen

Abrams P, Andersson K-E, Buccafusco JJ et al.. Muscarinic receptors: their distribution and function in body systems, and the implications for treating overactive bladder. Br J Pharmacol, 2006, 148:565–578. [PubMed: 16751797]

Abrams P, Freeman R, Anderstrom C, Mattiasson A. Tolterodine, a new antimuscarinic agent: as effective but better tolerated than oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder. Br J Urol, 1998, 81:801–810. [PubMed: 9666761]

Abrams P, Larsson G, Chapple C, Wein AJ. Factors involved in the success of antimuscarinic treatment. BJU Int, 1999, 83(suppl 2):42–47. [PubMed: 10210604]

Aihara T, Nakamura Y, Taketo MM et al.. Cholinergically stimulated gastric acid secretion is mediated by M₃ and M₅ but not M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in mice. Am J Physiol, 2005, 288:G1199–G1207.

Anaya JM, Talal N. Sjögren's syndrome comes of age. Semin Arthritis Rheum, 1999, 28:355–359. [PubMed: 10406403]

Barnes PJ. The role of anticholinergics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Med, 2004, 117(suppl 12A):24S–32S. [PubMed: 15693640]

Barnes PJ, Hansel TT. Prospects for new drugs for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet, 2004, 364:985–996. [PubMed: 15364192]

Berne RM, Levy MN. In, Cardiovascular Physiology, 8th ed. Mosby, St. Louis, 2001.

Birdsall NJM, Larenzo S. Allosterism at muscarinic receptors: ligands and mechanisms. Mini Rev Med Chem, 2005, 5:523–543. [PubMed: 15974931]

Bonner TI, Buckley NJ, Young AC, Brann MR. Identification of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes. Science, 1987, 237:527–532. [PubMed: 3037705]

Brodde OE, Michel MC. Adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in the human heart. Pharmacol Rev, 1999, 51:651–690. [PubMed: 10581327]

Carmine AA, Brogden RN. Pirenzepine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases. Drugs, 1985, 30:85–126. [PubMed: 3928324]

Caulfield MP. Muscarinic receptors—characterization, coupling and function. Pharmacol Ther, 1993, 58:319–379. [PubMed: 7504306]

Caulfield MP, Birdsall NJ. International Union of Pharmacology, XVII. Classification of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Pharmacol Rev, 1998, 50:279–290. [PubMed: 9647869]

Chapple CR. Muscarinic receptor antagonists in the treatment of overactive bladder. Urology, 2000, 55(suppl. 5A):33–46. [PubMed: 10767450]

Chapple C, Khullar V, Gabriel Z, Dooley JA. The effects of antimuscarinic treatments in overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol, 2005, 48:5–26. [PubMed: 15885877]

Chapple RR, Rechberger T, Al-Shukri S et al.. Randomized, double-blind placebo- and tolterodine-controlled trial of the once-daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin in patients with symptomatic overactive bladder. BJU Int, 2004, 93:303–310. [PubMed: 14764127]

Conn PJ, Christopoulos A, Lindsley CW. Allosteric modulators of GPCRs: A novel approach for the treatment of CNS disorders. Nature Rev Drug Discov, 2009a, 8:41–54.

Conn PJ, Jones CK, Lindsley CW. Subtype-selective allosteric modulators of muscarinic receptors for the treatment of CNS disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2009b, 30:148–155.

Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL et al.. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing–1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2000, 161:309–329. [PubMed: 10619836]

Cusack B, Nelson A, Richelson E. Binding of antidepressants to human brain receptors: focus on newer generation compounds. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 1994, 114:559–565. [PubMed: 7855217]

DiFrancesco D, Tromba C. Acetylcholine inhibits activation of the cardiac hyperpolarizing-activated current, i_f. Pflugers Arch, 1987, 410:139–142. [PubMed: 2825112]

Disse B, Speck GA, Rominger KL et al.. Tiotropium (Spiriva): mechanistical considerations and clinical profile in obstructive lung disease. Life Sci, 1999, 64:457–464. [PubMed: 10069510]

Eglen RM, Hegde SS, Watson N., Muscarinic receptor subtypes and smooth muscle function. Pharmacol Rev, 1996, 48:531–565. [PubMed: 8981565]

Feigl EO. Neural control of coronary blood flow. J Vasc Res, 1998, 35:85–92. [PubMed: 9588871]

Fisher JT, Vincent SG, Gomeza J et al.. Loss of vagally mediated bradycardia and bronchoconstriction in mice lacking M₂ or M₃ muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. FASEB J, 2004, 18:711–713. [PubMed: 14977875]

Furchgott RF. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor: Discovery, early studies, and identification as nitric oxide. Biosci Rep, 1999, 19:235–251. [PubMed: 10589989]

Gautam D, Heard TS, Cui Y et al.. Cholinergic stimulation of salivary secretion studied with M₁ and M₃ muscarinic receptor single- and double-knockout mice. Mol Pharmacol, 2004, 66:260–267. [PubMed: 15266016]

Goessl C, Sauter T, Michael T et al.. Efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine in children with detrusor hyperreflexia. Urology, 2000, 55:414–418. [PubMed: 10699623]

Goldfrank LR. Mushrooms. In, Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 8th ed. (Flomenbaum NE, Goldfrank LR, Hoffman RS, eds. et al.,) McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006, pp. 1564–1576.

Gomeza J, Shannon H, Kostenis E et al.. Pronounced pharmacologic deficits in M₂ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96:1692–1697. [PubMed: 9990086]

Goyal RK, Rattan S. Neurohumoral, hormonal, and drug receptors for the lower esophageal sphincter. Gastroenterology, 1978, 74:598–619. [PubMed: 24571]

Gross NJ. Tiotropium bromide. Chest, 2004, 126:1946–1953. [PubMed: 15596697]

Hamilton SE, Loose MD, M Qi et al.. Disruption of the M₁ receptor gene ablates muscarinic receptor-dependent M current regulation and seizure activity in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94:13311–13316. [PubMed: 9371842]

Hegde SS, Eglen RM. Muscarinic receptor subtypes modulating smooth muscle contractility in the urinary bladder. Life Sci, 1999, 64:419–428. [PubMed: 10069505]

Hulme EC, ZL Lu, Bee MS. Scanning mutagenesis studies of the M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Recept Chann, 2003, 9:215–228.

Ignarro LJ, Cirino G, Casini A, Napoli C. Nitric oxide as a signaling molecule in the vascular system: An overview. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 1999, 34:879–886. [PubMed: 10598133]

Kay G, Crook T, Rekeda L et al.. Differential effects of the antimuscarinic agents darifenacin and oxybutynin ER on memory in older subjects. Eur Urol, 2006, 50:317–326. [PubMed: 16687205]

Kent KM, Epstein SE. Neural basis for the genesis and control of arrhythmias associated with myocardial infarction. Cardiology, 1976, 61:61–74. [PubMed: 788902]

Kent KM, Epstein SE, Cooper T, Jacobowitz DM. Cholinergic innervation of the canine and human ventricular conducting system. Anatomic and electrophysiologic correlations. Circulation, 1974, 50:948–955. [PubMed: 4430098]

Khurana S, Chacon I, Xie G et al.. Vasodilatory effects of cholinergic agonists are greatly dimished in aorta from M₃R^–/– mice. Eur J Pharmacol, 2004, 493:127–132. [PubMed: 15189773]

Köppel C. Clinical sympatomatology and management of mushroom poisoning. Toxicon, 1993, 31:1513–1540. [PubMed: 8146866]

Krnjevíc K. Synaptic mechanisms modulated by acetylcholine in cerebral cortex. Prog Brain Res, 2004, 145:81–93. [PubMed: 14650908]

Lakatta EG, DiFrancesco D. What keeps us ticking: a funny current, a calcium clock, or both? J Mol Cell Cardiol, 2009, 47:157–170. [PubMed: 19361514]

Lamping KG, Wess J, Cui Y et al.. Muscarinic (M) receptors in coronary circulation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2004, 24:1253–1258. [PubMed: 15130910]

Levy MN, Schwartz PJ, eds., Vagal Control of the Heart: Experimental Basis and Clinical Implications. Futura, Armonk, NY, 1994.

Lewis ME, Al-Khalidi AH, Bonser RS et al.. Vagus nerve stimulation decreases left ventricular contractility in vivo in the human and pig heart. J Physiol, 2001, 534:547–552. [PubMed: 11454971]

Lyashkov AE, Vinogradova TM, Zahanich I et al.. Cholinergic receptor signaling modulates spotaneous firing of sinoatrial nodal cells via integrated effects on PKAH-dependent Ca²⁺ cycling and I_KACh. Am J Physiol, 2009, 297:949–959.

Matsui M, Motomura D, Fujikawa T et al.. Mice lacking M₂ and M₃ muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are devoid of cholinergic smooth muscle contractions but still viable. J Neurosci, 2002, 22:10627–10632. [PubMed: 12486155]

Matsui M, Motomura D, Karasawa H et al.. Multiple functional defects in peripheral autonomic organs in mice lacking muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene for the M₃ subtype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2000, 97:9579–9584. [PubMed: 10944224]

May LT, Leach K, Sexton PM, Christopoulos A. Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 2007, 47:1–51. [PubMed: 17009927]

Mirza NR, Peters D, Sparks RG. Xanomeline and the antipsychotic potential of muscarinic receptor subtype selective agonists. CNS Drug Rev, 2003, 9:159–186. [PubMed: 12847557]

Moncada S, Higgs EA. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies related to nitric oxide. FASEB J, 1995, 9: 1319–1330. [PubMed: 7557022]

Nawaratne V, Leach K, Suratman N et al.. New insights into the function of M₄ muscarinic acetylcholine receptors gained using a novel allosteric modulator and a DREADD (Designer Receptor Exclusively Activated by a Designer Drug). Mol Pharmacol, 2008, 74:1119–1131. [PubMed: 18628403]

Neubig RR, Spedding M, Kenakin T, Christopoulos A. International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII. Update on terms and symbols in quantitative pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev, 2003, 55:597–606. [PubMed: 14657418]

Oberhauser V, Schwertfeger E, Rutz T et al.. Acetylcholine release in human heart atrium: influence of muscarinic autoreceptors, diabetes, and age. Circulation, 2001, 103:1638–1643. [PubMed: 11273990]

Ono M, Takamura E, Shinozaki K et al.. Therapeutic effect of cevimeline on dry eye in patients with Sjögren's syndrome: a randomized, double-blind clinical study. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004, 138:6–17. [PubMed: 15234277]

Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T et al.. Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein–coupled receptor. Science, 2000, 289:739–745. [PubMed: 10926528]

Porter SR, Scully C, Hegarty AM. An update of the etiology and management of xerostomia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2004, 97:28–46. [PubMed: 14716254]

Richelson E. Receptor pharmacology of neuroleptics: Relation to clinical effects. J Clin Psychiatry, 1999, 10(suppl 10):5–14.

Roth B, Sheffler DJ, Kroeze WK. Magic shotguns versus magic bullets: selectively non-selective drugs for mood disorders and schizophrenia. Nature Rev Drug Discov, 2004, 3:353–359.

Shekhar A, Potter WZ, Lightfoot J et al.. Selective muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline as a novel treatment approach for schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry, 2008, 165:1033–1039. [PubMed: 18593778]

Stengel PW, Gomeza J, Wess J, Cohen ML. M₂ and M₄ receptor knockout mice: muscarinic receptor function in cardiac and smooth muscle in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2000, 292:877–885. [PubMed: 10688600]

Trendelenburg AU, Meyer A, Wess J, Starke K. Distinct mixtures of muscarinic receptor subtypes mediate inhibition of noradrenaline release in different mouse peripheral tissues, as studied with receptor knockout mice. Br J Pharmacol, 2005, 145:1153–1159. [PubMed: 15965496]

Tryba M, Cook D. Current guidelines on stress ulcer prophylaxis. Drugs, 1997, 54:581–596. [PubMed: 9339962]

Valant C, Gregory KJ, Hall NE et al.. A novel mechanism of G protein-coupled receptor functional selectivity. J Biol Chem, 2008, 283:29312–29321. [PubMed: 18723515]

Volpicelli LA, Levey AI. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Progr Brain Res, 2004, 145:59–66.

Wein AJ. Practical uropharmacology. Urol Clin North Am, 1991, 18:269–281. [PubMed: 2017809]

Wellstein A, Pitschner HF. Complex dose-response curves of atropine in man explained by different functions of M₁- and M₂-cholinoceptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol, 1988, 338:19–27. [PubMed: 3237253]

Wess J. Molecular biology of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Crit Rev Neurobiol, 1996, 10:69–99. [PubMed: 8853955]

Wess J. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knockout mice: novel phenotypes and clinical implications. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 2004, 44: 423–450. [PubMed: 14744253]

Wess J, Eglen RM, Gautam D. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: mutant mice provide new insights for drug development. Nature Rev Drug Discov, 2007, 6:721–733.

Wiseman LR, Faulds D. Oral pilocarpine: A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical potential in xerostomia. Drugs, 1995, 49:143–155. [PubMed: 7705213]

Yamada M, Lamping KG, Duttaroy A et al.. Cholinergic dilation of cerebral blood vessels is abolished in M₅ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001a, 98:14096–14101.

Yamada M, Miyakawa T, Duttaroy A et al.. Mice lacking the M₃muscarinic acetylcholine receptor are hypophagic and lean. Nature, 2001b, 410:207–212.

Pop-up div Successfully Displayed

This div only appears when the trigger link is hovered over. Otherwise it is hidden from view.

Chapter 9: Muscarinic Receptor Agonists and Antagonists

Send Email

Citation

Jump to a Section

ACETYLCHOLINE AND ITS MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR TARGET

Properties and Subtypes of Muscarinic Receptors

Pharmacological Effects of Acetylcholine

MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR AGONISTS

Figure 9–1.

Absorption, Distribution, and Elimination

Therapeutic Uses of Muscarinic Receptor Agonists

MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS

Figure 9–2.

Pharmacological Effects of Muscarinic Antagonists

Ipratropium and Tiotropium

Therapeutic Uses of Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists

Contraindications and Adverse Effects

Toxicology of Drugs with Antimuscarinic Properties

CLINICAL SUMMARY

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Pop-up div Successfully Displayed